A measurement of piano playing

Top-loudest rate

How reliably the top note is the loudest note of its chord.

What it sounds like

The same passage — Chopin Étude 10/1, bars 1–4 — from the recordings that sit lowest and highest on this measurement. Every clip is a note list replayed on one sampled grand at one gain, so the only difference you are hearing is the playing.

Least

Murray Perahia, 2001 — bars 1–4, top-loudest rate 69 %6 s
Maurizio Pollini, 1972 — bars 1–4, top-loudest rate 71 %5 s

Most

Claudio Arrau, 1956 — bars 1–4, top-loudest rate 81 %6 s
İdil Biret, 1990 — bars 1–4, top-loudest rate 77 %7 s

How it is calculated

Share of chords whose highest note carries the highest velocity.

How much pianists differ on it

Every piece in the library, with the range across its recordings. The units mean the same thing in every row, except for basic tempo, which is in each piece’s own beat.

PieceRecordingsLowestMedianHighest
Ravel Ondine61506578
Chopin Étude 10/131356781
Nocturne Op. 48/127607287
Rachmaninoff Prelude29577888
Pathétique II47697884
Chopin Étude 10/1219647896
Chopin Ballade 412708089
Schubert Op. 90/343748291
Schubert Op. 142/39798690
Fantaisie-Impromptu20778693
Ravel Pavane33768994
Gymnopédie 123709099
Nocturne Op. 9/232849196
Träumerei318192100
Clair de lune27859398
Brahms Op. 118/228879498
Mozart K. 545378494100

How reliably it can be measured

A Disklavier capture — the pianist’s own key sensors, no microphone — was rendered to audio, transcribed as if it were a recording, and re-measured. The error the transcription step introduces, as a multiple of how far pianists actually differ on this dial, is 1.31. noisy The transcription moves this dial about as far as pianists differ on it, so no claim should rest on where a single recording sits.