A measurement of piano playing

Soft-pedal share

How much of the time the una corda is down.

What it sounds like

The same passage — Träumerei, bars 2–3 — from the recordings that sit lowest and highest on this measurement. Every clip is a note list replayed on one sampled grand at one gain, so the only difference you are hearing is the playing.

Least

Jenő Jandó, 1992 — bars 2–3, soft-pedal share 0 %12 s
Eric Le Sage, 2010 — bars 2–3, soft-pedal share 0 %9 s

Most

Víkingur Ólafsson, 2023 — bars 2–3, soft-pedal share 100 %10 s
Christoph Eschenbach, 1966 — bars 2–3, soft-pedal share 100 %12 s

How it is calculated

Share of playing time with the soft pedal depressed. Poorly recovered from audio; treat with caution.

How much pianists differ on it

Every piece in the library, with the range across its recordings. The units mean the same thing in every row, except for basic tempo, which is in each piece’s own beat.

PieceRecordingsLowestMedianHighest
Chopin Étude 10/13101100
Schubert Op. 142/3901559
Chopin Étude 10/121901958
Chopin Ballade 41202453
Rachmaninoff Prelude2903264
Mozart K. 54537036100
Nocturne Op. 48/12703879
Pathétique II4704597
Fantaisie-Impromptu20204793
Nocturne Op. 9/23284791
Brahms Op. 118/22805289
Ravel Pavane3355581
Gymnopédie 123061100
Schubert Op. 90/34306295
Ravel Ondine6166595
Bach Prelude in C24065100
Clair de lune27479100
Träumerei31087100

How reliably it can be measured

A Disklavier capture — the pianist’s own key sensors, no microphone — was rendered to audio, transcribed as if it were a recording, and re-measured. The error the transcription step introduces, as a multiple of how far pianists actually differ on this dial, is 1.20. noisy The transcription moves this dial about as far as pianists differ on it, so no claim should rest on where a single recording sits.