A measurement of piano playing

Section contrast

Whether a player presses on into a contrasting section or draws back.

What it sounds like

The same passage — Nocturne Op. 48/1, bars 49–51 — from the recordings that sit lowest and highest on this measurement. Every clip is a note list replayed on one sampled grand at one gain, so the only difference you are hearing is the playing.

Least

Peter Katin, 1973 — bars 49–51, section contrast 0.16 log210 s
İdil Biret, 1992 — bars 49–51, section contrast 0.19 log211 s

Most

Garrick Ohlsson, 1979 — bars 49–51, section contrast 1.02 log28 s
Vladimir Ashkenazy, 1980 — bars 49–51, section contrast 0.89 log29 s

How it is calculated

log2 of the tempo of one section divided by another, chosen per piece.

How much pianists differ on it

Every piece in the library, with the range across its recordings. The units mean the same thing in every row, except for basic tempo, which is in each piece’s own beat.

PieceRecordingsLowestMedianHighest
Nocturne Op. 9/232-0.35-0.100.22
Chopin Étude 10/131-0.08-0.050.04
Schubert Op. 90/343-0.16-0.030.09
Gymnopédie 123-0.07-0.020.03
Bach Prelude in C27-0.09-0.020.05
Mozart K. 54537-0.10-0.010.06
Ravel Pavane33-0.490.000.28
Brahms Op. 118/228-0.290.060.31
Träumerei31-0.240.090.39
Pathétique II47-0.070.140.42
Chopin Étude 10/12190.050.170.32
Ravel Ondine610.010.280.56
Chopin Ballade 4120.340.470.88
Nocturne Op. 48/1270.160.481.02
Clair de lune270.190.511.04
Schubert Op. 142/390.660.750.95
Fantaisie-Impromptu200.821.101.32
Rachmaninoff Prelude292.232.553.20

How reliably it can be measured

A Disklavier capture — the pianist’s own key sensors, no microphone — was rendered to audio, transcribed as if it were a recording, and re-measured. The error the transcription step introduces, as a multiple of how far pianists actually differ on this dial, is 0.07. solid This dial survives transcription intact: where one recording sits on it can be argued from.