A measurement of piano playing

Coda fade

How much the closing bars are broadened relative to the music just before them.

What it sounds like

The same passage — Ravel Pavane, bars 70–72 — from the recordings that sit lowest and highest on this measurement. Every clip is a note list replayed on one sampled grand at one gain, so the only difference you are hearing is the playing.

Least

Monique Haas — bars 70–72, coda fade -0.82 log233 s
Seong-Jin Cho, 2025 — bars 70–72, coda fade -0.81 log230 s

Most

Menahem Pressler, 2018 — bars 70–72, coda fade -0.18 log225 s
Van Cliburn, 1976 — bars 70–72, coda fade -0.18 log218 s

How it is calculated

log2 of the coda's tempo divided by the previous section's. -0.60 means the coda runs at about two thirds the speed.

How much pianists differ on it

Every piece in the library, with the range across its recordings. The units mean the same thing in every row, except for basic tempo, which is in each piece’s own beat.

PieceRecordingsLowestMedianHighest
Schubert Op. 142/39-1.62-1.26-0.84
Ravel Pavane33-0.82-0.49-0.18
Träumerei31-0.64-0.34-0.02
Fantaisie-Impromptu20-0.51-0.24-0.03
Pathétique II47-0.63-0.230.01
Bach Prelude in C27-0.66-0.19-0.05
Nocturne Op. 9/232-0.25-0.060.11
Schubert Op. 90/343-0.44-0.050.11
Chopin Étude 10/131-0.15-0.050.03
Chopin Étude 10/1219-0.17-0.030.18
Gymnopédie 123-0.07-0.020.03
Brahms Op. 118/228-0.13-0.000.14
Chopin Ballade 412-0.20-0.000.41
Mozart K. 54537-0.070.000.10
Clair de lune27-0.270.140.54
Ravel Ondine61-0.180.170.45
Rachmaninoff Prelude29-0.030.400.67
Nocturne Op. 48/1270.170.511.14

How reliably it can be measured

A Disklavier capture — the pianist’s own key sensors, no microphone — was rendered to audio, transcribed as if it were a recording, and re-measured. The error the transcription step introduces, as a multiple of how far pianists actually differ on this dial, is 0.13. solid This dial survives transcription intact: where one recording sits on it can be argued from.